As Starlink pushes to extend its footprint in Africa, South African authorities are reportedly weighing a significant regulatory compromise to allow the satellite internet service to operate within the country. A high-stakes meeting between Elon Musk or his representatives and South African officials, including those accompanying President Cyril Ramaphosa on a U.S. visit, is expected to take place ahead of Ramaphosa’s engagement at the White House.

The subject of discussion: whether Starlink should be granted an exemption from South Africa’s Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) policy — a transformative law requiring 30% black ownership in local ICT firms — in favor of an “equity equivalence” program.

Musk’s Outcry and the Political Fallout

The negotiations come in the wake of comments from Elon Musk, who claimed on X (formerly Twitter) that Starlink was blocked in South Africa “because [he’s] not black.” The post attracted backlash and official rebuttals, including from Clayson Monyela, South Africa’s head of public diplomacy, who dismissed the claim as “not true” and unrelated to race.

Still, the dispute has reopened a complex debate around BEE, foreign investment, and the flexibility of local laws when dealing with international players. South Africa’s Department of Communications and Digital Technologies emphasized that any adjustment is not about Musk or Starlink specifically, but about cultivating an environment conducive to global digital investment.

Equity Equivalence: The Proposed Workaround

Under the proposed equity equivalence model, Starlink would not be required to cede 30% local ownership but could instead commit to investing in infrastructure or services that support underprivileged communities. Among the options on the table are funding digital training programs or donating Starlink kits to rural schools.

This wouldn’t be the first time South Africa offers such an alternative. Global automakers including BMW and Toyota previously utilized equity equivalence schemes to meet empowerment objectives without direct shareholding.

Starlink, owned by SpaceX, has already proposed installing 8,000 satellite kits in underserved rural schools as part of its compliance efforts. However, earlier attempts to bypass BEE rules drew criticism from lawmakers, with Communications Minister Solly Malatsi accused of undermining long-fought transformation goals. Critics argue such exemptions could set a dangerous precedent for foreign companies seeking to avoid meaningful local partnerships.

The Regulatory Dilemma and Digital Opportunity

Despite Starlink’s legal entity setup in South Africa, the regulatory gridlock has kept its services at bay — even as it rapidly expands across Africa, with active service in over 20 countries. The service is especially promising for rural South African households, where internet penetration remains alarmingly low — just 1.7% according to Statistics South Africa.

Malatsi has signaled that the government is working on a framework to integrate satellite providers into South Africa’s broader telecoms ecosystem. But internal tensions over policy integrity and sovereignty persist.

Broader Implications: Africa’s Tightrope with the West

The looming decision underscores a wider question for African regulators: How should they balance domestic laws with the push for foreign direct investment, especially when it involves influential Western companies?

As South Africa navigates its position between local empowerment policies and global tech integration, the outcome of this week’s discussions could define not just Starlink’s trajectory in the country, but also set a precedent for how African nations engage with Silicon Valley giants in the digital age.

Leave feedback about this

  • Quality
  • Price
  • Service

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image
Choose Video